Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
#Mmpi 2 rf test professional
Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS) and professional manual. Goldstein (Ed.), Handbook of psychology: Forensic psychology ((pp, Vol. Rogers (Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (3rd ed., pp. Detection strategies for malingering and defensiveness. Zaragoza (Eds.), Forensic applications of the MMPI-2 (pp.
Use of the MMPI and MMPI-2 in forensic neuropsychological evaluations. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
#Mmpi 2 rf test manual
The Personality Assessment Inventory professional manual (2nd ed.). The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 22, 666–679. Aggregation across multiple indicators improves the detection of malingering: relationship to likelihood ratios. Spielberger (Ed.), Current topics in clinical and community psychology (Vol. A sequential system for personality scale development. Boone (Ed.), Assessment of feigned cognitive impairment (pp. The MMPI-2 Fake Bad scale in the detection of noncredible brain injury claims. Malingering and defensiveness on the MMPI-2. The MMPI-2: An interpretive manual (2nd ed.). Incremental validity of the MMPI-2-RF over-reporting scales and RBS in assessing the veracity of memory complaints. Gervais, R., Ben-Porath, Y., Wygant, D., & Sellbom, M. Development and validation of a response bias scale (RBS) for the MMPI-2. Gervais, R., Ben-Porath, Y., Wygant, D., & Green, P. Detection of malingering on the MMPI: a meta-analysis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.īerry, D. Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF): Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.īen-Porath, Y. Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). On this point, F P-r performed exceptionally well with unelevated scores ( Ms < 55 T) consistently across diagnostic categories.ĪPA. An entirely separate concern is whether certain diagnostic groups, such as major depression, will have marked elevations on MMPI-2-RF scales thereby increasing the likelihood of false-positives. However, FBS-r and RBS may be useful in conjunction with other clinical data for ruling out FCI for genuine neuropsychological consults. As predicted by its detection strategies, most MMPI-2-RF validity scales have limited effectiveness with the FCI group. For the current study, a F P-r cut score ≥90 T for FMD produced virtually no false-positives (0.01) and only a moderate level of false-alarms. Moreover, the absence of severe elevations (≥80 T) on F-r proved effective at ruling-out most FMD. For FMD, both F-r and F P-r produced very large effect sizes ( ds > 2.00). Criterion measures included the Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms-2 (SIRS-2) for the FMD group, and below-chance performances on the Victoria Symptom Validity Test (VSVT) and the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) for the FCI group.
The current investigation used a known-groups design to examine the effectiveness of the MMPI-2-RF for differentiating FMD and feigned cognitive impairment (FCI) from patients with genuine disorders for a large civil forensic sample.
#Mmpi 2 rf test plus
Studies are now examining MMPI-2-RF with modified validity scales plus the new Infrequent Somatic Responses Scale (F S) and the recently-adapted Response Bias Scale (RBS). The MMPI and MMPI-2 validity scales have long been accepted as standard tools in the assessment of feigned mental disorders (FMD) based on their extensive empirical validation.
0 kommentar(er)
